AIMoCap
AIMoCap

MOCAP API

AI mocap API for production pipelines

Use AIMoCap API v-credit, async jobs, and target-aware outputs to add AI video mocap to production tools.

For product teams evaluating an AI mocap API with public documentation.

Short answer

An AI mocap API should turn uploaded source video into structured motion outputs while keeping target selection, usage accounting, and result downloads explicit.

When to use AIMoCap

Use AIMoCap when a product needs upload-based video mocap for Default animation output, Unitree G1 robot output, or both, with API v-credit separated from Studio credits.

When not to use AIMoCap

Do not use AIMoCap's API when the integration needs real-time live capture, undocumented private targets, or a one-call synchronous solve that blocks until all artifacts are ready.

People searching for an AI mocap API are usually evaluating whether a video-to-motion capability can become part of a product workflow, not just whether a demo page exists.

AIMoCap's public API is intentionally target-aware. A client can request animation-oriented Default output, Unitree G1 robot-oriented output, or both when the account and job limits allow it.

The important boundary is product fit. API v-credit, supported targets, trim fields, export FPS, queue behavior, and downloadable artifacts should be reviewed before the API becomes a production dependency.

AI mocap API product-fit facts

  • The public API is upload-based and asynchronous.
  • Default and Unitree G1 are the supported public API target families.
  • AI mocap API usage keeps API v-credit separate from web Studio credit for product integrations.
  • A single API job can request multiple supported outputs when allowed.
  • Trim fields and export FPS are integration controls, not promises that every source clip produces clean motion.
  • Source video quality, occlusion, camera motion, and downstream cleanup still affect result usefulness.
  • AIMoCap returns motion artifacts; it is not a real-time capture SDK or robot controller.
  • A robust client should treat Default FBX, Unitree G1 robot output, preview video, and errors as separate artifacts rather than a single generic result.
  • The client should make complete-upload and polling retry-safe so a network interruption does not create duplicate jobs or lose the original job ID.
  • An AI mocap API integration should define user-visible states separately from backend states: uploading, queued, processing, completed, failed, and result-ready are different product moments.
  • A production client should test at least one accepted clip, one source-quality rejection, one trim-range mistake, one queue wait, and one result download retry before launch.
  • If the integration exposes both web Studio jobs and API jobs, the UI should label API jobs and v-credit usage separately from web credit usage so account history remains understandable.

AI mocap API integration decision matrix

Use this matrix to decide whether the integration is ready for production API jobs or still needs workflow design.

User-facing upload feature
Persist the AIMoCap job ID before upload starts, expose queued/processing/completed states, and show target-specific artifacts only when ready.
Treating a network timeout as job failure when the backend may already have accepted the job.
Batch animation processing
Request Default output, choose export FPS deliberately, and store source clip, trim range, downloaded FBX, and v-credit ledger reference.
Mixing API v-credit with web Studio credit or assuming preview video is the final animation artifact.
Robot-output integration
Request Unitree G1 only when the downstream system can validate robot-oriented artifacts separately from animation output.
Presenting robot output as hardware-ready control data instead of a target-aware artifact for downstream robotics checks.
Production launch readiness
Run an acceptance packet that covers happy path, source rejection, queue wait, retry, failed job, ledger trace, and result download verification.
Shipping after one successful demo clip without knowing how the client behaves when upload, polling, or artifact download is interrupted.

API integration concerns

Developer-facing mocap searches are rarely about slogans. They are about whether uploads are reliable, billing is auditable, failed jobs are explainable, and returned artifacts fit the actual pipeline.

Persist the job ID before upload work starts

Teams evaluating a AI mocap API usually worry about long-running jobs and retries, so the integration should store the job ID for production mocap pipelines, upload the source video, call complete-upload, and poll instead of waiting on one fragile request.

Price predictability depends on separate API usage

For AI mocap API, developers often need to explain automated job cost to finance or product teams. AIMoCap keeps API v-credit separate from web Studio credits so production mocap pipelines traffic can be audited independently.

Output target mismatch is the common integration bug

In production mocap pipelines, API users should test whether they need Default FBX, Unitree G1 robot output, or a prepared custom avatar target before scaling traffic; the same source video can produce different AI mocap API artifacts for different downstream teams.

Test product behavior beyond the demo clip

For AI mocap API evaluation, include an accepted clip, a cropped-body rejection, a trim mistake, a queue wait, a multi-target result, and a ledger check so product and support teams see the full operating envelope.

Keep a support trail for automated users

An AI mocap API product should store the job ID, account plan, target list, v-credit event, terminal status, and artifact family because automated users usually report job symptoms rather than raw API responses.

What to evaluate before adopting an AI mocap API

Use these facts to decide whether this workflow matches your output, integration, and cleanup needs.

Target coverage

A production integration should know whether it needs animation output, robot output, custom-avatar workflows, or a mix of target types.

Usage accounting

API v-credit makes automated jobs visible separately from web Studio usage, which matters for billing, quota, and account ledgers.

Failure boundaries

An AI mocap API client should treat upload, validation, queue admission, processing, and result download as separate states so retries and terminal failures stay explicit.

Traceable integration

A production integration is easier to debug when each job stores source metadata, target selection, status transitions, ledger entry, and downloaded artifact checksums.

Acceptance packet

A credible AI mocap API page should say how to test the integration before launch, including success, recoverable timeout, terminal failure, and artifact-download paths.

Product-state mapping

AI mocap API developers need a clear mapping between backend job state, v-credit usage, artifact readiness, and user-facing UI state so queued work is not mislabeled as failed processing.

Product-envelope acceptance

For AI mocap API evaluation, keep accepted, rejected, multi-target, trim-error, queue-wait, and ledger-check cases so the product team understands normal behavior beyond one successful demo clip.

Support-trail retry proof

The API client should persist job ID, target list, API plan, v-credit event, terminal status, and artifact family before retrying so automated users can report a concrete failure.

AI mocap state map

Product copy should distinguish model processing, source validation, queue wait, insufficient v-credit, target artifact failure, and completed results instead of collapsing all errors into processing failed.

AI mocap API evaluation workflow

01

Choose the output target

Decide whether the integration needs Default FBX-oriented motion, Unitree G1 robot-oriented artifacts, or a combined job for review and robotics workflows.

02

Estimate usage and limits

Plan around API v-credit, trim duration, file size, export FPS, and concurrency before sending user video into an automated pipeline.

03

Integrate the async lifecycle

Create the job, upload source video, complete upload, poll status, and download artifacts only after the job reaches a terminal completed state.

04

Store an artifact manifest

Persist job ID, target IDs, upload-complete state, terminal status, downloaded artifact type, and v-credit ledger reference so support can trace the full run.

05

Run an integration acceptance packet

Before production launch, test a representative clip set across upload, complete-upload, queueing, polling, download, ledger checks, and downstream artifact import.

Common questions

What makes AIMoCap an AI mocap API instead of only a web tool?

The API exposes an upload, complete-upload, status polling, and result download workflow so a product can automate supported video mocap jobs instead of requiring manual Studio-only operation.

Which outputs should an AI mocap API integration request?

Use Default for animation-oriented FBX review and Unitree G1 for robot-oriented motion output. Request both only when the integration needs both artifact families from the same source clip.

Does API usage share web Studio credits?

No. API jobs use API v-credit so automated product usage can be tracked separately from web Studio credits.

Can AIMoCap guarantee clean motion from any uploaded video?

No. AIMoCap processes source video into motion artifacts, but source quality, occlusion, framing, and downstream cleanup still matter.

What should an AI mocap API client store?

Store job ID, requested target IDs, upload completion, terminal status, artifact downloads, v-credit ledger reference, source-video notes, and any retry or failure stage.

What should an AI mocap API launch test include?

Test create, upload, complete-upload, polling, completed result download, source-quality failure, timeout recovery, ledger trace, and downstream artifact import on representative clips.

Sources reviewed

These related AIMoCap resources document the workflow boundaries, output formats, and implementation details referenced on this page.