Character-specific review
Teams can inspect motion on the intended character rather than only on a generic target.
CUSTOM AVATAR
Prepare reusable custom avatar targets for AIMoCap so source video can drive your own character workflow.
For teams searching for motion capture on a custom avatar.
Custom avatar motion capture means applying solved video motion to a prepared and published avatar target, not uploading a character during every job.
Use AIMoCap when a team needs repeated mocap jobs on the same prepared character and wants Studio review before download or downstream cleanup.
Do not use this path when the avatar is still a draft, when binding has not been tested, or when Default output is enough.
Custom avatar motion capture is about target reuse. The same prepared character can be selected again after upload, pose review, binding, retarget testing, and publish.
This is different from generic video-to-FBX output because the motion is evaluated on the team's own avatar.
The page should remain focused on repeatable character workflows rather than repeating the entire mocap product pitch.
Use these facts to decide whether this workflow matches your output, integration, and cleanup needs.
Teams can inspect motion on the intended character rather than only on a generic target.
Publishing turns setup work into a reusable target for future jobs.
Both the source video and the avatar setup affect the final review.
Use character management to upload, pose-check, bind, retarget-test, and publish the avatar.
When submitting a mocap job, choose the published avatar if the result should be reviewed on that specific character.
Review whether the source clip and avatar proportions produce acceptable motion before downstream cleanup.
Yes, after the avatar is uploaded, bound, tested, and published as a reusable target.
Yes. Default output is generic animation-oriented output; a custom avatar job reviews motion on a prepared character.
No. Poor lighting, occlusion, or unclear motion can still reduce result quality.
Continue through this topic cluster to compare output formats, API options, and workflow boundaries.
Competitor details are summarized from public official pages and public community or review discussions. Community feedback is treated as directional signal, not as a universal product claim.